BIO 2026: Beyond the DNA Blueprint

The interview titled “BIO 2026: Beyond the DNA Blueprint,” published in The Pharma Navigator.

Karolina Žukauskienė, Scientific Project Manager at VUGENE — a specialist in multi-omics data analysis and interpretation, explains that while DNA provides a baseline for research and development, unlocking true biological complexity requires integrating dynamic multi-omics datasets.

 

Karolina Žukauskienė, Scientific Project Manager at VUGENE

Karolina Žukauskienė, Scientific Project Manager at VUGENE

 

“Historically, genomics was the first omic discipline to achieve large-scale standardization,” specifies Žukauskienė. That standardization enabled a dramatic reduction in cost of drug discovery and allowed companies to mature their pipelines more rapidly, she notes.

“Naturally, the industry focused on extracting as much value as possible from DNA-based information,” Žukauskienė continues. “However, biology is dynamic and DNA really provides a good basis, it’s a footprint, a blueprint, but it doesn’t fully explain how the cells interact, how disease develops, how disease evolves over time, and how the treatment works once injected. To answer those questions, researchers really needed multiple layers of biological information, and to include more dynamic omics, such as proteomics and metabolomics that really reflect the current state of the biological system.”

However, industry faced a challenge in relation to the integration of multi-omics data, which uses different technologies at different scales, resolutions, and quality levels, meaning that it was easier to look at the individual omics, Žukauskienė explains. “But we are now really reaching the point where technology — both data generation and computational power of analytical methodologies — have evolved really sufficiently to make true multi-omics integration possible and applicable in the R&D setting,” she says.

From a technological standpoint, data fragmentation is still a persistent issue for R&D teams, continues Žukauskienė. “We see that different organizations and sometimes different departments within the same organization are generating data independently and are using different platforms, different analytical standards, different storage systems,” she points out. “As a result, data sets may exist within the same organization but remain very disconnected with one another.”

Additionally, while generating multi-omics data has become relatively straightforward, analyzing and interpreting the data remains challenging, Žukauskienė remarks. “Omics datasets are often collected across different cohorts and experimental conditions and that makes extracting biologically meaningful signals more complex, and that really requires quite specific expertise,” she adds.

“Bridging the gap and collaborating within organizations, within these departments, is key,” Žukauskienė asserts. “The challenges don’t lie in generating the data anymore, but it is about creating the analytical frameworks and connecting diverse datasets that can be translated into biologically important insights and lead to new discoveries and developments.”

Focusing on single-cell sequencing and transcriptomics, Žukauskienė reveals that while these have afforded industry with powerful insights into precision medicine, there is still a challenge around distinguishing real biology from noise. “Industry is addressing [this issue] through simply developing more advanced statistical methods for analyzing the datasets and also applying AI-based foundational models,” she says.

“So, one of the most broadly used models is called single-cell GPT at the moment that can really validate rare cell populations against large reference datasets,” Žukauskienė highlights. This model utilizes AI for analysis and features more precise tools to combat potential noise issues without losing genuine signals, she emphasizes.

“I think, when it comes to rare cell types, the focus today is not only on finding and identifying the rare cells, but to ensure that the findings are reliable, reproducible, and really biologically relevant,” Žukauskienė summarizes. “So, I think here we’ve once again come to the interpretation part, and just really understanding the biological relevance and meaning.”

 

Watch full interview: Link
Published by: The Pharma Navigator on Jun 23, 2026
Cover photo credits: Andrej Vasilenko

Similar Resources

omics
Data analysis
June 18, 2026

Choosing Your Omics

Choosing the right omics type begins with a question: Which molecular layer or layers hold the answer to the biological phenomenon I am observing? The conventional layers remain the backbone ...

Vilija Lomeikaitė
Data analysis
May 7, 2026

Challenges in Single-Cell Data Analysis

An article titled “Challenges in Single-Cell Data Analysis,” published in Biocompare. Written by Caitlin Smith, the article explains best practices for working with large and noisy datasets, such as single-cell ...